Saturday, May 13, 2017

An Hour of Running May Add 7 Hours to Your Life

Walking and running is the greatest workout to lose weight. This also has a significant impact on longevity. Comparing with non-runners, people lived longer than who don't go for a jog. It is clearly visible that running can extend your lifetime. 

This is how long your life lasts for every 60 minutes running

A new study with 55,000 participants gives the formula that links 'running' and longevity.
It is the best investment, and does not come in small print: it does not matter if it only runs sporadically or at a low rate. The hours you spend jogging on the asphalt or gymnastic tape will add (multiplied by seven) to your life expectancy. Although it sounds like an athletic guru's mantra.

An Hour of Running May Add 7 Hours to Your Life
The data do not come out of nowhere. If a regular runner trains two hours a week (based on previous research by the Cooper Institute in Dallas [USA]), And does it for 40 years, in total will have spent about six months running. 
Thanks to this exercise, and according to the researchers, their life expectancy could increase to 3.2 years. 
What the actual sum: 1 hour of running exercise = 7 more hours of life.

But don't think that formula will achieve immortality since these amounts are "not infinite.," says Duck-Chul Lee, a professor at Iowa State University (USA) and co-author of the study. 

Regardless of the hours you spend jogging, the increase in life you have observed does not exceed 3 years. However, researchers in Dallas have reported that the risk of premature death declines by 40% in regular runners and that those who start practicing this sport can reduce heart attacks by 25%.

And what about the rest of sports? They also have benefits, but they are not as accused. Walking, cycling or other activities less intense than running can reduce the risk of premature death by 12%. 
All these data are associated, that is, they show that runners tend to live longer, but this does not imply that this exercise is the direct cause of increased longevity. 

Athletes tend to have a healthy lifestyle, with no significant excess weight and steady blood pressure, and this plays a critical role in small premature mortality, Dr. Lee concludes. Even so, it may be time to take the calculator out of your mobile and start making numbers.

What is better walking or running?

Although going for a walk or run is a good exercise with many benefits, but I prefer to run when it comes to losing weight. But if anyone can't run, it's ok to have a walk. After repeatedly telling the benefits of walking, we face the ultimate question: is it more beneficial than jogging?

Determining whether running is better than walking, or if walking is better than running, is an issue that has uncovered scientists for several years. Or, at least, he did it so far: walking is as good and healthy as running.

A six-year study at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, California, revealed that running helps to lose weight faster than walking, but that both activities are healthy equally because it does not depend on the intensity of the exercise but how many Calories burn during it. That is, the study was based primarily on distance rather than on time.

Paul T. Williams, a Berkeley investigator, estimates that "a person would need to walk about seven miles at a fast pace to get the same amount of exercise as running five kilometers. It would take twice as long, about an hour and fifteen minutes instead of 38 minutes. " When this happens, the reduction in risk of high blood pressure, high cholesterol and diabetes is almost equal to the decrease in risk you have running.

The study, described in The New York Times, was made about a universe of 15,237 people walking and 33,215 people who choose to run as a method to be in shape. At the time of starting the study, each participant set their weight, waist measurement, what type of diet they took and what mileage they did each week walking or running.

As time passed, studies showed that those who ran maintained their body better than those who walked. One of the reasons for this effect is the incidence of both exercises on a person's appetite, demonstrated in a study by the University of Wyoming.

This study was performed on 19 women and consisted of different activities during two occasions: in the first, the group ran or walked for an hour; In the second, the group rested for an hour. After each activity, the volunteers had at their disposal a table with food and were told to eat everything they wanted.

In the end, it was revealed that women walking ate 50 calories more than those who burned walking, while those who ran consumed 200 calories less than those burned with exercise. This is because, after exercise, runners have high levels of a hormone called peptide YY, known to suppress appetite. Instead, those who walked did not raise the levels of this hormone, so their taste remained.

Finally, Berkeley researchers found that people who ran decreased the risk of 

  1. High cholesterol by 4.3 percent;
  2. High blood pressure by 4.2 percent;
  3. Diabetes by 12.1 percent;
  4. Coronary problems by 4.5 percent. 
Walking people, on the other hand, lowered their risk of having 

  1. High blood pressure by 7.2 percent; 
  2. Diabetes by 12.3 percent; 
  3. High cholesterol by 7 percent; 
  4. Coronary problems by 9.3 percent.

What is better walking or running?

That is, running and walking are healthy almost equally. Running implies, perhaps, more effort than walking, but it requires less time and walking is more accessible, even if it requires a little more time. It all depends on what our possibilities, times and tastes are.
What do you choose: running or walking? If you want to lose weight or reduce belly fat, read this one


Post a Comment

Home About-us Privacy Policy Contact-us Services